4.3 Article

Angiogenic gene signature in human pancreatic cancer correlates with TGF-beta and inflammatory transcriptomes

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 323-341

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6345

关键词

pancreatic cancer; TCGA; angiogenesis; TGF-beta; inflammation

资金

  1. Pancreatic Cancer Signature Center
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [F30CA200301]
  3. US Public Health Service Grant from the NCI [CA-75059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) are hypovascular, but overexpress pro-angiogenic factors and exhibit regions of microvasculature. Using RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we previously reported that similar to 12% of PDACs have an angiogenesis gene signature with increased expression of multiple proangiogenic genes. By analyzing the recently expanded TCGA dataset, we now report that this signature is present in similar to 35% of PDACs but that it is mostly distinct from an angiogenesis signature present in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). These PDACs exhibit a transcriptome that reflects active TGF-beta signaling, and up-regulation of several pro-inflammatory genes, and many members of JAK signaling pathways. Moreover, expression of SMAD4 and HDAC9 correlates with endothelial cell abundance in PDAC tissues. Concomitantly targeting the TGF-beta type I receptor (T beta RI) kinase with SB505124 and JAK1-2 with ruxolitinib suppresses JAK1 phosphorylation and blocks proliferative cross-talk between human pancreatic cancer cells (PCCs) and human endothelial cells (ECs), and these anti-proliferative effects were mimicked by JAK1 silencing in ECs. By contrast, either inhibitor alone does not suppress their enhanced proliferation in 3D co-cultures. These findings suggest that targeting both TGF-beta and JAK1 signaling could be explored therapeutically in the 35% of PDAC patients whose cancers exhibit an angiogenesis gene signature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据