4.7 Article

Three-dimensional-networked NiCo2S4 nanosheet array/carbon cloth anodes for high-performance lithium-ion batteries

期刊

NPG ASIA MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/am.2015.63

关键词

-

资金

  1. Applied Research Grant of the City University of Hong Kong [ARG 9667111]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171035, 51302035, 51372213]
  3. PhD Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20130075120001, 20110075110008]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M550203]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [13ZR1451200]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232013D3-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the design and synthesis of three-dimensional (3D)-networked NiCo2S4 nanosheet arrays (NSAs) grown on carbon cloth along with their novel application as anodes in lithium-ion batteries. The relatively small (similar to 60%) volumetric expansion of NiCo2S4 nanosheets during the lithiation process was confirmed by in situ transmission electron microscopy and is attributed to their mesoporous nature. The 3D network structure of NiCo2S4 nanosheets offers the additional advantages of large surface area, efficient electron and ion transport capability, easy access of electrolyte to the electrode surface, sufficient void space and mechanical robustness. The fabricated electrodes exhibited outstanding lithium-storage performance including high specific capacity, excellent cycling stability and high rate of performance. A reversible capacity of similar to 1275 mAh g(-1) was obtained at a current density of 1000 mA g(-1), and the devices retained similar to 1137 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles, which is the highest value reported to date for electrodes made of metal sulfide nanostructures or their composites. Our results suggest that 3D-networked NiCo2S4 NSA/carbon cloth composites are a promising material for electrodes in high-performance lithium-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据