4.3 Article

Effects of an active eccentric stretching program for the knee flexor muscles on range of motion and torque

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 176-182

出版社

ASSOCIACAO BRASILEIRA PESQUISA POS-GRADUACAO FISIOTERAPIA-ABRAPG-FT
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-35552008000300004

关键词

active eccentric stretching; flexibility; torque; ROM; knee flexors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the changes in knee range of motion (ROM) and torque of knee flexor and extensor muscles after an active eccentric stretching program for the knee flexor muscles. Methods: Thirty-four volunteers (23 women and 11 men), aged 34.42 +/- 9.3 years, performed an active eccentric stretching program for the knee flexor muscles in the standing posture, consisting of seven repetitions of one minute each, with 30 seconds of resting between them. The stretching program was performed twice a week, for four weeks. Knee extension ROM and the torque of the knee flexor and extensor muscles were evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer before and after the stretching program. The torque was evaluated in the isometric, isokinetic concentric and eccentric modes at 30 degrees/s and 60 degrees/s. Results: There was an increase in ROM from 53.7 +/- 13 degrees to 30.1 +/- 16 degrees (p=0.0001), in isometric torque of the flexors from 89 +/- 32Nm to 93 +/- 33Nm (p=0.01) and of the extensors from 178 +/- 67Nm to 187 +/- 73Nm (p=0.006). The concentric and eccentric torque of the flexors at 30 degrees/s increased from 90 +/- 31Nm to 96 +/- 31Nm (p=0.001) and from 100 +/- 34Nm to 105 +/- 35Nm (p=0.01), respectively. The concentric torque of the extensors at 60 degrees/s increased from 144 +/- 51Nm to 151 +/- 58Nm (p=0.02), and the eccentric torque at 30 degrees/s increased from 175 +/- 71Nm to 189 +/- 73Nm (p=0.01). Conclusions: The stretching program proposed was effective for increasing the flexibility of the stretched muscles and the torque of the agonist (stretched) muscle groups and their antagonists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据