4.1 Article

Dynamic accumulation of sesquiterpenes in essential oil of Pogostemon cablin

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA FARMACOGNOSIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2014.11.001

关键词

Essential oil; GC-MS; Patchouli alcohol; Pogostemon cablin; Sesquiterpenes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81360618, 31360210]
  2. Specialized Fund for the Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Hainan Province [ZY201413]
  3. State Key Subject of Botany at Hainan University [071001]
  4. Academic Discipline Construction Project Plan in the Central and Western Regions of Hainan University [ZXBJH-XK008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Essential oil produced by patchouli was one of the most important naturally occurring base materials used in the perfume industry, containing various sesquiterpenes. Three different parts (leaves, stems and roots) of Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth., Lamiaceae, were profiled in relation to different maturation phases in this paper, evaluating the variations in content of the major sesquiterpenes in the essential oil. Twelve sesquiterpenes were analyzed by GC-MS throughout the maturity of P. cablin. Patchouli alcohol (37.54%-51.02% in leaves, 28.24%-41.96% in stems and 14.55%-35.12% in roots) was the major sesquiterpene during the maturation of the plant. The average content of several other sesquiterpenes (alpha-bulnesene, alpha-guaiene, seychellene, beta-humulene and caryophyllene) were higher than 3% among leaves, stems and roots. The content of essential oil, patchouli alcohol, a-bulnesene and several other compounds were highly accumulated at 210 days of maturation after cultivation of P. cablin. Thus, this period was the best moment to exploit the maximum level of these high value-added compounds in P. cablin. Furthermore, our results indicated that the essential oil extracted from leaves of P. cablin has the highest potential to be used in the perfume industry. (C) 2014 Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacognosia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据