4.0 Article

Oviposition of Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 and Aedes albopictus Skuse, 1894 (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and field conditions using ovitraps associated to different control agents, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENTOMOLOGIA
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 304-310

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA ENTOMOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2018.08.001

关键词

Chikungunya; Control; Dengue; Insecticides; Zika

资金

  1. Laboratory of Biological Control and Biotechnology of Malaria and Dengue of the National Institute of Research of the Amazon
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Amazonas
  3. National Council for the Scientific and Technological Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of different control agents of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus associated with ovitraps under laboratory and field conditions. Five treatments were used: grass infusion +Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (gI + Bti), grass infusion +Saccharopolyspora spinosa (gI + Ss), grass infusion + Pyriproxyfen (gI + P), distilled water + Toxorhynchites haemorrhoidalis (dW + Th), and grass infusion (gI) (control). The highest mean number of eggs of both species were obtained with grass infusion in the laboratory. Among control agents, the lowest mean of A. aegypti eggs occurred with gI + Ss and the lowest mean of A. albopictus eggs occurred with dW + Th. There was no difference between treatments in A. aegypti (P= 0.4320) and A. albopictus (P= 0.7179). In the field, the highest mean number of eggs for both species were obtained with gI + Ss, and the lowest values were obtained with gI + P (P= 0.0124). The treatments can be applied to both the surveillance and the control, but ovitraps with biological larvicide Bti were more effective and safer considering the number of eggs laid and selectivity of pathogens for mosquitoes. (C) 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据