4.8 Article

Colloquium: The unexpected properties of alkali metal iron selenide superconductors

期刊

REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 849-867

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.849

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-1104386]
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1104386] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The iron-based superconductors that contain FeAs layers as the fundamental building block in the crystal structures have been rationalized in the past using ideas based on the Fermi surface nesting of hole and electron pockets when in the presence of weak Hubbard U interactions. This approach seemed appropriate considering the small values of the magnetic moments in the parent compounds and the clear evidence based on photoemission experiments of the required electron and hole pockets. However, recent results in the context of alkali metal iron selenides, with generic chemical composition A(x)Fe(2-y)Se(2) (A = alkali metal element), have challenged those previous ideas since at particular compositions y the low-temperature ground states are insulating and display antiferro-magnetic order with large iron magnetic moments. Moreover, angle-resolved photoemission studies have revealed the absence of hole pockets at the Fermi level in these materials. The present status of this exciting area of research, with the potential to alter conceptually our understanding of the iron-based superconductors, is here reviewed, covering both experimental and theoretical investigations. Other recent related developments are also briefly reviewed, such as the study of selenide two-leg ladders and the discovery of superconductivity in a single layer of FeSe. The conceptual issues considered established for the alkali metal iron selenides, as well as several issues that still require further work, are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据