3.9 Article

Responsible Approach to Marine Stock Enhancement: An Update

期刊

REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 189-210

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10641262.2010.491564

关键词

fisheries enhancement; stock enhancement; sea ranching; restocking; responsible approach; planning; assessment; population dynamics; models

资金

  1. William R and Lenore Mote Eminent Scholar Chair in Fisheries Ecology at Florida State University
  2. Mote Marine Laboratory
  3. Science Consortium for Ocean Replenishment (SCORE)
  4. Charles M. Breder Chair at Mote Marine Laboratory
  5. Hatchery Science Review Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Marine stock enhancement is a set of management approaches involving the release of cultured organisms to enhance or restore fisheries. Such practices, including sea ranching, stock enhancement, and restocking, are widespread, of variable success, and often controversial. A set of principles aimed at promoting responsible development of restocking, stock enhancement, and sea ranching has been proposed by Blankenship and Leber [American Fisheries Society Symposia 15: 167-175 (1995)], and has gained widespread acceptance as the 'Responsible Approach'. Fisheries science and management, in general, and many aspects of fisheries enhancement have developed rapidly since the responsible approach was first formulated. Here we provide an update to the Responsible Approach in light of these developments. The updated approach emphasizes the need for taking a broad and integrated view of the role of enhancements within fisheries management systems; using a stakeholder participatory and scientifically informed, accountable planning process; and assessing the potential contribution of enhancement and alternative or additional measures to fisheries management goals early on in the development or reform process. Progress in fisheries assessment methods applicable to enhancements and in fisheries governance provides the means for practical implementation of the updated approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据