4.7 Article

A model for the microstructure behaviour and strength evolution in lath martensite

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 81-93

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.018

关键词

Martensite; Yield strength; Dislocations; Cottrell atmospheres; Steels

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/L025, 213/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/L025213/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L025213/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new model describing the microstructure and strength of lath martensite is introduced. The packet and block size were found to linearly depend on the prior-austenite grain size when introducing relevant crystallographic and geometric relationships of their hierarchical arrangements. A mechanism for the lath boundary arrangement within a block is postulated to ensure complete carbon redistribution to the lath boundaries. Accordingly, the dislocation density is obtained by considering the lattice distortion energy within a lath being equal to the strain energy of the dislocation density at the lath boundaries. Tempering effects are introduced by estimating the extent of carbon diffusing away from the lath boundaries; this mechanism relaxes the Cottrell atmospheres of lath dislocations and coarsens the boundaries. The yield stress as well as the microstructure evolution during tempering are successfully predicted by combining these results. The model is further extended to describe the yield stress in dual-phase steel microstructures by employing the iso-work principle. The model predictions are validated against experimental data in seven martensitic and five dual-phase steels, where the prior-austenite grain size, carbon content, tempering conditions and martensite volume fraction are employed as input. These results cover wide composition, initial microstructure and tempering conditions. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据