4.5 Article

Modulation of cosmic microwave background polarization with a warm rapidly rotating half-wave plate on the Atacama B-Mode Search instrument

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4862058

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-0355328, PHY-085587]
  2. U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NNX08AE03G]
  3. Wilkinson Fund
  4. NIST Innovations in Measurement Science program
  5. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica de Chile (CONICYT)
  6. Canada Foundation of Innovation under Compute Canada
  7. Government of Ontario
  8. Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence
  9. University of Toronto
  10. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship
  11. National Science Foundation Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship
  12. NASA Office of the Chief Technologist's Space Technology Research Fellowship
  13. CONICYT [1122]
  14. Division Of Physics
  15. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1214379] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluate the modulation of cosmic microwave background polarization using a rapidly rotating, half-wave plate (HWP) on the Atacama B-Mode Search. After demodulating the time-ordered-data (TOD), we find a significant reduction of atmospheric fluctuations. The demodulated TOD is stable on time scales of 500-1000 s, corresponding to frequencies of 1-2 mHz. This facilitates recovery of cosmological information at large angular scales, which are typically available only from balloon-borne or satellite experiments. This technique also achieves a sensitive measurement of celestial polarization without differencing the TOD of paired detectors sensitive to two orthogonal linear polarizations. This is the first demonstration of the ability to remove atmospheric contamination at these levels from a ground-based platform using a rapidly rotating HWP. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据