4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Time-resolved measurements of the hot-electron population in ignition-scale experiments on the National Ignition Facility

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 85, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4890537

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0001944]
  2. University of Rochester
  3. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  5. DOE [LLNL-PROC-655392]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In laser-driven inertial confinement fusion, hot electrons can preheat the fuel and prevent fusion-pellet compression to ignition conditions. Measuring the hot-electron population is key to designing an optimized ignition platform. The hot electrons in these high-intensity, laser-driven experiments, created via laser-plasma interactions, can be inferred from the bremsstrahlung generated by hot electrons interacting with the target. At the National Ignition Facility (NIF) [G. H. Miller, E. I. Moses, and C. R. Wuest, Opt. Eng. 43, 2841 (2004)], the filter-fluorescer x-ray (FFLEX) diagnostic-a multichannel, hard x-ray spectrometer operating in the 20-500 keV range-has been upgraded to provide fully time-resolved, absolute measurements of the bremsstrahlung spectrum with similar to 300 ps resolution. Initial time-resolved data exhibited significant background and low signal-to-noise ratio, leading to a redesign of the FFLEX housing and enhanced shielding around the detector. The FFLEX x-ray sensitivity was characterized with an absolutely calibrated, energy-dispersive high-purity germanium detector using the high-energy x-ray source at NSTec Livermore Operations over a range of K-shell fluorescence energies up to 111 keV (U K-beta). The detectors impulse response function was measured in situ on NIF short-pulse (similar to 90 ps) experiments, and in off-line tests. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据