4.5 Article

Alpha and recoil track detection in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)-Towards a method for in vitro assessment of radiopharmaceuticals internalized in cancer cells

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4868505

关键词

-

资金

  1. Oxford Cancer Research Centre [OCRC0611NF]
  2. Cancer Research-UK
  3. Oxford Cancer Imaging Centre
  4. MRC [MC_PC_12020] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_12020] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for detection and characterization of single MeV alpha-particle and recoil tracks in PMMA photoresist by atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis has been demonstrated. The energy deposition along the track is shown to lead to a latent pattern in the resist due to contrast reversal. It has been shown that the pattern, consisting of conical spikes, can be developed by conventional processing as a result of the dissolution rate of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) being greater than that for the modified material in the cylindrical volume of the track core. The spikes can be imaged and counted by routine AFM analysis. Investigations by angular-resolved near-grazing incidence reveal additional tracks that correspond to recoil tracks. The observations have been correlated with modelling, and shown to be in qualitative agreement with prevailing descriptions of collision cascades. The results may be relevant to technologies that are based on detection and characterization of single energetic ions. In particular, the direct visualization of the collision cascade may allow more accurate estimates of the actual interaction volume, which in turn will permit more precise assessment of dose distribution of alpha-emitting radionuclides used for targeted radiotherapy. The results could also be relevant to other diagnostic or process technologies based on interaction of energetic ions with matter. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据