4.6 Article

Resilience metrics to inform ecosystem management under global change with application to coral reefs

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 1088-1096

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12380

关键词

climate change; conservation; decision-making; dynamics; resource management

类别

资金

  1. Natural Environmental Research Programme Tropical Ecosystem's Hub

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Environmental policy instruments often require that natural resource managers safeguard the resilience of ecosystems. However, 'resilience' has been a difficult concept to operationalise. Two forms of resilience are recognised in the ecological literature. 'Ecological resilience' concerns ecosystems that possess alternative equilibrial states (attractors) and has been operationalised in a few systems. 'Engineering resilience' was developed for ecosystems with a single attractor, but its use is confined to systems that gravitate towards a stable equilibrium. 2. We present a general method to quantify engineering resilience that can be applied irrespective of an ecosystem's stability or proclivity to obey multiple attractors. The technique uses a system model to distinguish the effects of globally driven (and essentially unmanageable) stressors, such as climate change and ocean acidification, fromregional- and local-scale (manageable) stressors on the ecosystem. 3. We illustrate the technique using a simple coral reef model and find it able to calculate the impacts of managing crown-of-thorns starfish against a background of increasing stress from climate change and ocean acidification. 4. Resilience analyses using our approach help assess the relative importance of local-or regional-scale management interventions under varying degrees of global environmental change, even if they preside over long-term ecosystem decline. Several frameworks of varying complexity are provided to guide the linkage of resilience metrics to environmental decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据