4.5 Article

A multi-axis confocal rheoscope for studying shear flow of structured fluids

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4868688

关键词

-

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-C1-018-02]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR 1056662]
  3. (U.S.) Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [ER46517]
  4. National Science Foundation CBET-PMP Award [1232666]
  5. Colby College
  6. DoD, (U.S.) Air Force Office of Scientific Research (USAFOSR), National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship [32 CFR 168a]
  7. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-87ER-45331]
  8. National Science Foundation [CHE-1059108]
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Chemistry [1059108] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Materials Research
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1056662] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  14. Directorate For Engineering [1232666] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a new design for a confocal rheoscope that enables uniform uniaxial or biaxial shear. The design consists of two precisely positioned parallel plates with a gap that can be adjusted down to 2 +/- 0.1 mu m, allowing for the exploration of confinement effects. By using our shear cell in conjunction with a biaxial force measurement device and a high-speed confocal microscope, we are able to measure the real-time biaxial stress while simultaneously imaging the material three-dimensional structure. We illustrate the importance of the instrument capabilities by discussing the applications of this instrument in current and future research topics in colloidal suspensions. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据