4.5 Article

Variable-wavelength frequency-domain terahertz ellipsometry

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3297902

关键词

backward wave oscillators; ellipsometry; optical polarisers; phosphorus; silicon

资金

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-09-C-0097]
  2. National Science Foundation [0922937, 0907475]
  3. NSF MRSEC QSPIN at UNL [DMR-0820521]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0907475] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0922937] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report an experimental setup for wavelength-tunable frequency-domain ellipsometric measurements in the terahertz spectral range from 0.2 to 1.5 THz employing a desktop-based backward wave oscillator source. The instrument allows for variable angles of incidence between 30 degrees and 90 degrees and operates in a polarizer-sample-rotating analyzer scheme. The backward wave oscillator source has a tunable base frequency of 107-177 GHz and is augmented with a set of Schottky diode frequency multipliers in order to extend the spectral range to 1.5 THz. We use an odd-bounce image rotation system in combination with a wire grid polarizer to prepare the input polarization state. A highly phosphorous-doped Si substrate serves as a first sample model system. We show that the ellipsometric data obtained with our novel terahertz ellipsometer can be well described within the classical Drude model, which at the same time is in perfect agreement with midinfrared ellipsometry data obtained from the same sample for comparison. The analysis of the terahertz ellipsometric data of a low phosphorous-doped n-type Si substrate demonstrates that ellipsometry in the terahertz spectral range allows the determination of free charge-carrier properties for electron concentrations as low as 8x10(14) cm(-3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据