4.3 Article

Reassessment of the cheirolepidiaceous conifer Frenelopsis teixeirae Alvin et Pais from the Early Cretaceous (Hauterivian) of Portugal and palaeoenvironmental considerations

期刊

REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
卷 161, 期 1-2, 页码 30-42

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.03.002

关键词

Frenelopsis; conifer cuticles; Early Cretaceous; palaeoenvironment and palaeoclimate; western Portugal

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/24849/2005]
  2. CNRS-UMR [5125 PEPS]
  3. ANR AMBRACE of the French Agence nationale de la recherche [BLAN07-1-184190]
  4. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of the Spanish government [CGL2008-00809/BTE, CGL2009-11838/BTE]
  5. Catalan government [2009SGR-01451]
  6. ANGIOGAL Project [PTDC/CTE-GIX/104999/2008]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/24849/2005, PTDC/CTE-GIX/104999/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frenelopsis teixeirae Alvin et Pais is reported from the Lower Cretaceous (Hauterivian) of the Vale Cortico clay pit, Santa Susana Formation, near Torres Vedras, western Portugal. This is the second occurrence of F. teixeirae, previously known from a single specimen from the Valanginian of the Vale de Lobos Formation exposed at the beach cliff near Sesimbra. The diagnosis is emended and the description is completed based on well preserved leafs and twigs compressions. The specimens consist of leafy axes with whorls of either two or three leaves, each of the abaxial and adaxial surfaces showing a central horseshoe-shaped notch at the base, a trichome of both long hairs and massive papillae covering both outer cuticle surfaces, and stomata also borne on the adaxial cuticle. The dark grey mudstone bed with F. teixeirae is interpreted as a tidal-flat to estuarine deposit. In Portugal Frenelopsis species are known from a wide variety of deposits from the Valanginian to the Maastrichtian reflecting specific habitats. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据