4.3 Article

Analogous trends in pollen percentages and carbon stable isotope composition of Holocene peat - Possible interpretation for palaeoclimate studies

期刊

REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
卷 156, 期 3-4, 页码 507-518

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2009.04.014

关键词

carbon; isotope; pollen; peat; climate; Holocene

资金

  1. Polish Ministry of Science [3P04C03222]
  2. The University of Wroclaw [2022/W/ING, 1017/S/ING]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollen and spore analysis and analysis of carbon stable isotope composition in a peat core from Hala Izerska (SW Poland) were used for palaeoclimate studies of the Holocene over the last similar to 8.5 ka. The results of these two methods have been compared and variations of the delta C-13 value show a clear relationship with the pollen percentages of tree taxa, such as Carpinus, Fagus, Picea, and Anus as well as with spores of Sphagnum and akinetes of Cyanophyta. However, lags of up to similar to 200 years of pollen maxima and minima versus delta C-13 were observed. The delta C-13 value in the peat core varied between -23.47 and -27.58%. and is interpreted here as reflecting temperature control of the carbon isotope composition of the peat. According to this interpretation and pollen analysis of the study area, the following climatic periods for the Holocene can be described: Atlantic-beginning warm (8.50-7.90 ka cal. BP) followed by moderated cold (7.90-5.75 ka cal. BP), Subboreal-beginning moderated cold (5.75-5.40 ka cal. BP) then warm (5.40-2.55 ka cal. BP), Subatlantic-beginning warm (2.55-2.20 ka cal. BP) then cold and moderate cold (2.20 ka-0.40 ka cal. BP) with a climatic minimum similar to 1.60 ka cal. BP. The highest relative difference between growing season temperatures was about 3.6 degrees C, which has been observed between the Subboreal temperature maximum (5.00 ka cal. BP) and the Subatlantic temperature minimum (1.60 ka cal. BP). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据