4.2 Article

The Spanish HIV BioBank: a model of cooperative HIV research

期刊

RETROVIROLOGY
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-27

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Fondos de Investigacion Sanitaria [FIS PI061479]
  2. Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa Sanitaria ISCIII [RETIC RD06/0006/0035]
  3. Fundacion para la Investigacion y Prevencion del SIDA en Espana, FIPSE [36514/05, 36536/05]
  4. Fundacion Caja Navarra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The collection of samples from HIV-infected patients is the beginning of the chain of translational research. To carry out quality research that could eventually end in a personalized treatment for HIV, it is essential to guarantee the availability, quality and traceability of samples, under a strict system of quality management. Methods: The Spanish HIV BioBank was created with the objectives of processing, storing and providing distinct samples from HIV/AIDS patients, categorized according to strictly defined characteristics, free of charge to research projects. Strict compliance to ethical norms is always guaranteed. Results: At the moment, the HIV BioBank possesses nearly 50,000 vials containing different prospective longitudinal study sample types. More than 1,700 of these samples are now used in 19 national and international research projects. Conclusion: The HIV BioBank represents a novel approach to HIV research that might be of general interest not only for basic and clinical research teams working on HIV, but also for those groups trying to establish large networks focused on research on specific clinical problems. It also represents a model to stimulate cooperative research among large numbers of research groups working as a network on specific clinical problems. The main objective of this article is to show the structure and function of the HIV BioBank that allow it to very efficiently release samples to different research project not only in Spain but also in other countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据