4.2 Article

The host protein Staufen1 interacts with the Pr55Gag zinc fingers and regulates HIV-1 assembly via its N-terminus

期刊

RETROVIROLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-5-41

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The formation of new infectious human immunodeficiency type 1 virus (HIV-1) mainly relies on the homo-multimerization of the viral structural polyprotein Pr55(Gag) and on the recruitment of host factors. We have previously shown that the double-stranded RNA-binding protein Staufen 1 (Stau1), likely through an interaction between its third double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD3) and the nucleocapsid (NC) domain of Pr55(Gag), participates in HIV-1 assembly by influencing Pr55(Gag) multimerization. Results: We now report the fine mapping of Stau1/Pr55(Gag) association using co-immunoprecipitation and live cell bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assays. On the one hand, our results show that the Stau1-Pr55(Gag) interaction requires the integrity of at least one of the two zinc fingers in the NC domain of Pr55(Gag) but not that of the NC N-terminal basic region. Disruption of both zinc fingers dramatically impeded Pr55(Gag) multimerization and virus particle release. In parallel, we tested several Stau1 deletion mutants for their capacity to influence Pr55(Gag) multimerization using the Pr55(Gag)/Pr55(Gag) BRET assay in live cells. Our results revealed that a molecular determinant of 12 amino acids at the N-terminal end of Stau1 is necessary to increase Pr55(Gag) multimerization and particle release. However, this region is not required for Stau1 interaction with the viral polyprotein Pr55(Gag). Conclusion: These data highlight that Stau1 is a modular protein and that Stau1 influences Pr55(Gag) multimerization via 1) an interaction between its dsRBD3 and Pr55(Gag) zinc fingers and 2) a regulatory domain within the N-terminus that could recruit host machineries that are critical for the completion of new HIV-1 capsids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据