4.4 Article

REASONS FOR DISCONTINUATION OF INTRAVITREAL VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INHIBITORS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000173

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors; treatment efficacy; patient acceptance; quality of life; patient outcomes; treatment discontinuation

资金

  1. RANZCO Eye Foundation, Sydney
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra
  3. NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This study was aimed to identify the reasons for discontinuing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: This study is a retrospective chart review of a single Australian private practice. Analysis included patients who discontinued treatment from March 2006 to June 2012. Results: Of 248 patients who commenced treatment, 105 (42.3%) had discontinued by June 2012. The reasons for discontinuation were available for 102 of the 105 (97.1%) patients. In 9 (3.6%) patients of the entire cohort, the doctor stopped the treatment as the lesion became inactive, whereas further treatment was thought to be futile in 27 (10.9%) patients. Twenty-six (10.5%) patients declined further treatment with 2 (0.8%) because of excessive treatment visits, 2 (0.8%) because of difficulty in attending, 2 (0.8%) because of the expense, 3 (1.2%) because of pain/discomfort, 6 (2.4%) thought that the treatment was not beneficial, and 11 (4.4%) had other medical conditions that were more severe. Treatment was discontinued in 40 (16.1%) patients for other reasons such as moving to another region in 27 (10.9%) and death in 11 (4.4%). Conclusion: These results indicate that the burden of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections was a reason for treatment discontinuation in only a small minority of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据