4.4 Article

RETICULAR MACULAR DISEASE IS ASSOCIATED WITH MULTILOBULAR GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31828991b2

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; geographic atrophy; reticular macular disease; scanning laser ophthalmoscopy; autofluorescence imaging; progression

资金

  1. New York Community Trust (New York, NY)
  2. National Eye Institute (Bethesda, MD) [R01 EY015520, R24 EY017404]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY)
  4. Kaplen Foundation
  5. Doris Duke Clinical Research Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the incidence of reticular macular disease (RMD), a subpheno-type of age-related macular degeneration, in multilobular geographic atrophy (GA) and its relation to GA progression. Methods: One hundred and fifty-seven eyes of 99 subjects with age-related macular degeneration, primary GA, and good quality autofluorescence, and/or infrared images were classified into unilobular GA (1 lesion) or multilobular GA (>= 2 distinct and/or coalescent lesions). Thirty-four subjects (50 eyes) had serial imaging. The authors determined the spatiotemporal relationships of RMD to GA and GA progression rates in five macular fields. Results: 91.7% eyes (144 of 157) had multilobular GA, 95.8% of which exhibited RMD. In subjects with serial imaging, the mean GA growth rate significantly differed between the unilobular and multilobular groups (0.40 vs. 1.30 mm(2)/year, P < 0.001). Of the macular fields in these eyes, 77.1% of fields with RMD at baseline showed subsequent GA progression, while 53.4% of fields without RMD showed progression (P < 0.001). Percentage of fields with RMD significantly correlated with GA progression rate (P = 0.01). Conclusion: Autofluorescence and infrared imaging demonstrates that RMD is nearly always present with multilobular GA in age-related macular degeneration. Furthermore, GA lobules frequently develop in areas of RMD, suggesting progression of a single underlying disease process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据