4.5 Article

Mild therapeutic hypothermia is associated with favourable outcome in patients after cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 82, 期 9, 页码 1162-1167

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.022

关键词

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Heart arrest; Induced hypothermia; Prognosis; Resuscitation; Survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (32-34 degrees C) improves neurological recovery and reduces the risk of death in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest when the initial rhythm is ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. The aim of the presented study was to investigate the effect of mild therapeutic hypothermia (32-34 degrees C for 24 h) on neurological outcome and mortality in patients who had been successfully resuscitated from non-ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study we included cardiac arrest survivors of 18 years of age or older suffering a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with asystole or pulseless electric activity as the first documented rhythm. Data were collected from 1992 to 2009. Main outcome measures were neurological outcome within six month and mortality after six months. Results: Three hundred and seventy-four patients were analysed. Hypothermia was induced in 135 patients. Patients who were treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia were more likely to have good neurological outcomes in comparison to patients who were not treated with hypothermia with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95% confidence interval: 1.08-3.13). In addition, the rate of mortality was significantly lower in the hypothermia group (odds ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.93). Conclusion: Treatment with mild therapeutic hypothermia at a temperature of 32-34. C for 24 h is associated with improved neurological outcome and a reduced risk of death following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with non-shockable rhythms. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据