4.5 Article

The state of systemic circulation, collapsed or preserved defines the need for hyperoxic or normoxic resuscitation in neonatal mice with hypoxia-ischemia

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 224-229

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.024

关键词

Neonates; 100% oxygen; Room air; Return of spontaneous circulation

资金

  1. Young Investigator Award
  2. NIH [NS056146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a primary goal of resuscitation. For neonatal resuscitation the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recommends oxygen concentrations ranging from 21% to 100%. Aims and methods: This study (a) compared the efficacy of resuscitation with room air (RA) or 100% O-2 in achieving ROSC in 46 neonatal mice with circulatory collapse induced by lethal hypoxia-ischemia (HI) and (b) determined whether re-oxygenation with RA or 100% O-2 alters the extent of HI cerebral injury in mice with preserved systemic circulation (n = 31). We also compared changes in generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cerebral mitochondria in response to re-oxygenation with RA or 100% O-2. Result: In HI-mice with collapsed circulation re-oxygenation with 100% O-2 versus RA resulted in significantly greater rate of ROSC. In HI-mice with preserved systemic circulation and regional (unilateral) cerebral ischemia the restoration of cerebral blood flow was significantly faster upon re-oxygenation with 100% O-2, than RA. However, no difference in the extent of brain injury was detected. Regardless of the mode of re-oxygenation, reperfusion in these mice was associated with markedly accelerated ROS production in brain mitochondria. Conclusion: In murine HI associated with circulatory collapse the resuscitation limited to re-oxygenation with 100% O-2 is superior to the use of RA in achievement of the ROSC. However, in Hi-mice with preserved systemic circulation hyperoxic re-oxygenation has no benefit over the normoxic brain recovery. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据