期刊
RESUSCITATION
卷 80, 期 10, 页码 1164-1168出版社
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.019
关键词
Basic life support (BLS); Bystander CPR; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Chest compression; Education; Manikin; Randomized controlled trial
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of 1-h practical chest compress inn-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with or without a preparatory self-learning video. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group or a video group who received a self-learning video before attending the 1-h chest compression-only CPR training program. The primary outcome measure was the total number of chest compressions during a 2-min test period. Results: 214 participants were enrolled, 183 of whom completed this study. In a simulation test just before practical training began, 88 (92.6%) of the video group attempted chest compressions, while only 58 (64.4%) of the control group (p < 0.001) did so. The total number of chest compressions was significantly greater in the video group than in the control group (100.5 +/- 61.5 versus 74.4 +/- 55.5, p = 0.012). The proportion of those who attempted to use an automated external defibrillator (AED) was significantly greater in the video group (74.7% versus 28.7%, p < 0.001). After the 1-h practical training, the number of total chest compressions markedly increased regardless of the type of CPR training program and intergroup differences had almost disappeared (161.0 +/- 31.8 in the video group and 159.0 +/- 35.7 in the control group, p = 0.628). Conclusions: 1-h chest compression-only CPR training makes it possible for the general public to perform satisfactory chest compressions. Although a self-learning video encouraged people to perform CPR, their performance levels were not sufficient, confirming that practical training as well is essential. (UMIN000001046). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据