4.5 Article

Spontaneous gasping increases cerebral blood flow during untreated fatal hemorrhagic shock

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 109-112

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.08.013

关键词

Hemorrhagic shock; Cardiac arrest; Pulseless electrical activity; Gasping; Cerebral blood flow; Intrathoracic pressure

资金

  1. MEXT KAKENHI [17791291]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Gasping has been found to be associated with improved ventilation, stroke volume, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) during untreated ventricular fibrillation. However, its effects have not been thoroughly assessed during fatal hemorrhagic shock. In this study, we hypothesized that gasping increases CBF during fatal hemorrhagic shock. Methods: Ten male Wistar rats (body weight: 195-225 g) were intraperitoneally anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg). Arterial pressure was recorded in the left femoral artery. Respiratory thoracic movements were recorded with a pressure sensor placed under the animal's back. The left carotid artery was cannulated to continuously withdraw blood (0.1 ml/min) as a means of inducing hemorrhagic shock. CBF was measured with a laser flow meter. Results: The arterial pulse wave was lost after withdrawing 7.3 +/- 0.9 ml of blood and at that point, spontaneous gasping developed in all of the animals. CBF averaged 48.8 +/- 8.8 ml/(min 100 g-brain) under control conditions before the start of blood withdrawal, and it decreased significantly to 4.4% of baseline during the pulseless state (P<0.01). The gasping, observed during in the pulseless state increased CBF to an average of 54.2% of baseline (P<0.01). Conclusions: Gasping was observed during fatal hemorrhagic shock and generated large increases in CBF. The forceful contraction of the inspiratory Muscles during gasping may increase CBF by decreasing intrathoracic pressure, which increases venous return to the heart. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据