4.5 Article

Slow infusion of calcium channel blockers compared with intravenous adenosine in the emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardia

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 80, 期 5, 页码 523-528

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.01.017

关键词

Supraventricular tachycardia; Calcium channel blockers; Verapamil; Diltiazem; Adenosine; Hypotension; Cost

资金

  1. Department of Clinical Research, Singapore General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has, over the last two decades, changed from verapamil to adenosine primarily owing to documented hypotensive episodes occurring with rapid bolus infusions of the calcium channel blocker. Slow infusions of calcium channel blockers have not previously demonstrated hypotension to any significant degree. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of bolus intravenous adenosine and slow infusion of the calcium channel blockers verapamil and diltiazem in the emergency treatment of spontaneous SVT. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial with one group receiving bolus intravenous adenosine 6 mg followed, if conversion was not achieved, by adenosine 12 mg and the other group receiving a slow infusion of either verapamil at 1 rate of 1 mg per minute up to 1 maximum dose of 20 mg, or diltiazem at a rate of 2.5 mg per minute up to a maximum dose of 50 mg. These infusions would be stopped at time of conversion of the SVT or when the whole dose was administered. Heart rate and blood pressure was continuously monitored during drug infusion and for up to 2 h post-conversion. Results: A total of 206 patients with spontaneous SVT were analysed. Of these, 102 were administered calcium channel blockers (verapamil = 48, diltiazem = 54) and 104 were given adenosine. The conversion rates for the calcium channel blockers (98%) were statistically higher than the adenosine group (86.5%). p = 0.002, RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23. The initial mean change in blood pressure post-conversion in the calcium channel blocker group was -13.0/-8.1 mmHg (verapamil) and -7.0/-9.4 mmHg (diltiazem) and 2.6/-1.7 mmHg for adenosine. Only one patient in the calcium channel group (0.98%) (95% CI 0.025-5.3) developed hypotension, and none in the adenosine group. Conclusion: Slow infusion of calcium channel blockers is in alternative to adenosine in the emergency treatment of stable patients with SVT. Calcium channel blockers are safe and affordable for healthcare systems where the availability of adenosine is limited. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据