4.5 Article

Relative adrenal insufficiency in post-cardiac arrest shock is under-recognized

期刊

RESUSCITATION
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 221-225

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.07.034

关键词

cardiac arrest; relative adrenal insufficiency; corticosteroids; shock

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Suppression of the adrenal axis may occur frequently in post-cardiac arrest patients. Physiological doses of corticosteroids have been shown to reverse hypotension and decrease mortality in other forms of shock. We sought to investigate current clinical practice pertaining to the evaluation for relative adrenal insufficiency in post-cardiac arrest shock. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of post-cardiac arrest patients in an urban emergency department. Inclusion criteria included pre-hospital. cardiac arrest patients over the age of 18 with a sustained return of spontaneous circulation that required vasopressor support. Exclusion criteria were traumatic arrest and cardiac arrest in the presence of healthcare personnel. The primary endpoint was the percent of patients in refractory shock that either had their adrenal axis tested or were treated for presumed relative adrenal insufficiency. Data analysis was descriptive in nature. Results: A total of 79 post-cardiac arrest patients were analyzed. Of the 79 patients, 69 were vasopressor-dependent. Of this group, 13% (9/69) had a cortisol level checked (with or without cosyntropin stimulation). Of those who had a cosyntropin stimulation test performed, 86% met biochemical criteria for relative adrenal insufficiency. Seventeen percent of vasopressor-dependent patients received corticosteroids explicitly for their shock state. Overall, only 32% of patients in refractory shock had testing for relative adrenal insufficiency or received corticosteroids for shock. Conclusions: Though vasopressor-dependent shock is common in post-cardiac arrest patients, adrenal insufficiency was not considered in the majority of cases. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据