4.6 Article

Occult nodal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer at clinical stage IA by PET/CT

期刊

RESPIROLOGY
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 1179-1184

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01793.x

关键词

computed tomography; lung cancer staging; mediastinal lymph node; mediastinoscopy; positron emission tomography

资金

  1. IN-SUNG Foundation for Medical Research [CA98061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objective: The introduction of F-18-FDG PET/CT has enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of nodal staging for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analysed risk factors for occult nodal metastasis in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC as determined by F-18-FDG PET/CT. Methods: Data for 147 patients diagnosed as clinical stage IA NSCLC by PET/CT from 2005 to 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. All study patients underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT for lung cancer staging. They also underwent cervical mediastinoscopy or systematic lymph node dissection. Results: Cervical mediastinoscopy was performed in 78 patients (53.1%), and N2 involvement was detected in 3.8% (3/78) of these patients. Thoracotomy with systematic lymph node dissection was done in 144 patients. Four patients (2.8%, 4/144) were diagnosed with N2 disease after systematic lymph node dissection. Total N2 involvement was 4.8% (7/147). As 9.5% (14/147) of study patients had N1 disease, 14.3% (21/147) of patients had occult nodal (N1 or N2) metastasis. In univariate analyses, larger tumour size and a higher primary tumour maximum standardized uptake value >7.3 (SUVmax) were associated with occult nodal metastasis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a primary tumour SUVmax >7.3 was an independent predictor of occult nodal metastasis (odds ratio: 7.574; P = 0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative PET/CT scans contribute to reduce the frequency of occult nodal metastasis compared with those reported in the pre-PET/CT era. The higher SUVmax in primary tumour was an independent predictor of occult nodal metastasis in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC by PET/CT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据