4.5 Article

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness decreases through childhood

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 215-222

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.09.013

关键词

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness; Longitudinal; Asthma; Child; Adolescent

资金

  1. Norwegian Research Council
  2. University of Oslo
  3. Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation
  4. Regional Health East Authority
  5. Norwegian Association of Asthma and Allergy
  6. Kloster foundation
  7. Ulleval University Hospital
  8. AstraZeneca

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limited knowledge exists about development of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) through adolescence. We aimed to assess changes in and risk factors for BHR in adolescence. From a Norwegian birth cohort 517 subjects underwent clinical examinations, structured interviews and methacholine challenges at age 10 and 16. BHR was divided into four categories: no BHR (cumulative methacholine dose required to reduce FEV1 by 20% (PD20) >16 mu mol), borderline BHR (PD20 <= 16 and >8 mu mol), mild to moderate BHR (PD20 <= 8 and >1 mu mol), and severe BHR (PD20 <= 1 mu mol). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors and possible confounders. The number of children with PD20 <= 8 decreased from 172 (33%) to 79(15%) from age 10-16 (p < 0.001). Most children (n = 295, 57%) remained in the same BHR (category) from age 10-16 (50% with no BHR), whereas the majority 182 (82%) of the 222 children who changed BHR category, had decreased severity at age 16. PD20 <= 8 at age 10 was the major risk factor for PD20 <= 8 6 years later (odds ratio 6.3), without significant confounding effect (>25% change) of gender, active rhinitis, active asthma, height, FEV1/FVC, or allergic sensitization. BHR decreased overall in severity through adolescence, was stable for the majority of children and only a minority (8%) had increased BHR from age 10 to 16. Mild to moderate and severe BHR at age 10 were major risk factors for PD20 <= 8 at 16 years and not modified by asthma or body size. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据