4.5 Article

Factors associated with high healthcare resource utilisation among COPD patients

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 106, 期 12, 页码 1734-1742

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.09.009

关键词

CORD; Hospitalisation; Physical activity; Healthcare resource utilisation; Systemic inflammation

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CORD) places a huge economic burden on healthcare systems, especially patients with frequent exacerbations and co-morbidities. Objectives: To identify factors associated with high utilisation of healthcare resources in a population of patients with COPD. Method: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study with the aim of identifying the factors associated with high resource utilisation among patients with COPD. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study population, as well as data on health-related quality of life, respiratory symptoms, presence of anxiety and depression, physical activity and lung function were collected. We examined the relationship between these variables and high utilisation of healthcare resources, by performing a multivariate analysis based on a logistic regression model. Results: 115 patients (64 were high users of healthcare resources, and 51 control patients) from 13 hospitals were selected. Patients presenting high resource utilisation had worse FEV1, worse basal SpO(2), less distance walked in the 6-minute walk test, and increased dyspnoea. They also had a worse BODE index, worse scores in all dimensions of the EURO-QOL 5D and the LCADL scale, and displayed a higher prevalence of depression. Multivariate analysis yielded a statistically significant association between SpO(2), LCADL scores, serum fibrinogen values and total leukocyte count, and high healthcare resource utilisation. Conclusions: COPD patients who incur higher healthcare resource utilisation show reduced physical activity, increased respiratory failure and increased systemic inflammation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据