4.5 Article

Improvement of heart rate variability after exercise training and its predictors in COPD

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 105, 期 7, 页码 1054-1062

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.01.014

关键词

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Heart rate variability; Exercise training; Determinants

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)/Brazil
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)/Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Current literature lacks solid evidence on the improvement of heart rate variability (HRV) after exercise training in patients with COPD. Objectives: We aimed to investigate changes in HRV after two exercise training programs in patients with COPD and to investigate the determinants of these eventual changes. Methods: Forty patients with COPD (FEV1 39 +/- 13%pred) were randomized into high (n = 20) or Low (n = 20) intensity exercise training (3-month duration), and had their HRV assessed by the head-up tilt test before and after either protocols. Baseline spirometry, level of daily physical activity, exercise capacity, body composition, functional status, health-related quality of life and muscle force were also assessed to investigate the determinants of improvement in HRV after the training program. Results: There was a significant improvement in HRV only after the high-intensity protocol (pre versus post; SDNN 29 +/- 15 ms versus 36 +/- 19 ms; rMSSD 22 +/- 14 ms versus 28 +/- 22 ms; p < 0.05 for both). Higher values of biceps brachialis strength, time spent walking in daily life and SDNN at baseline were determinants of improvement in HRV after the training program. Conclusions: High-intensity exercise training improves HRV at rest and during orthostatic stimulus in patients with COPD. Better baseline total HRV, muscle force and daily physical activity level are predictors of HRV improvements after the training program. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据