4.5 Article

Identification of fungal DNA in BALF from patients with home-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 105, 期 11, 页码 1696-1703

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.07.009

关键词

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis; Trichosporon; Fusarium; Fungal DNA; Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan
  2. Foundation for Total Health Promotion, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591140] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In Japan, a major type of home-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is summer-type HP, which is caused by Trichosporon asahii (T. asahii) or Trichosporon mucoides. Some patients with home-related HP test negative for antibodies against Trichosporon; yet, a causative mold antigen cannot be identified. Methods: We analyzed 19 patients with home-related HP, 8 healthy volunteers, and 35 patients with other diseases. We extracted DNA from cell pellets of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), amplified the DNA by PCR using Trichosporon-specific primers or other fungus-specific primers, and cloned as well as sequenced the PCR amplicon. Other primers used were specific for Acremonium chrysogenum, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Fusarium napiforme, Humicola fuscoatra, Penicillium corylophilum, and Pezizia domiciliana. Results: We detected Trichosporon DNA (n = 17) and F. napiforme DNA (n = 2) by PCR in 19 patients with home-related HP; however, these species were not identified in healthy volunteers. After sequencing of the PCR amplicon for Trichosporon species, we identified T. asahii (n = 11), Trichosporon japonicum (n = 1), and Cryptococcus uzbekistanesis (n = 4). Conclusion: We could detect fungal DNA in BALF cell pellets from patients with home-related HP. These data suggest that this method might be useful to detect antigens responsible for home-related HP. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据