4.5 Article

HSP47 in lung fibroblasts is a predictor of survival in fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 104, 期 6, 页码 895-901

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.01.011

关键词

Collagen vascular disease; Fibrotic interstitial pneumonia; Fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; Heat shock protein 47; Usual interstitial pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The histopathologic pattern is currently the most important prognostic marker for idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, more highly sensitive markers are now required. Heat shock protein (HSP) 47, a collagen-specific molecular chaperone, is involved in the processing and/or secretion of procollagens, and it has been demonstrated that HSP47 expression is significantly higher in the lung specimens of idiopathic UIP than in UIP associated with collagen vascular diseases (CVD). However, its expression in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), the other common pathological pattern of IIP, has not been well investigated. Therefore, the association between lung fibroblast HSP47 expression and prognosis in fibrotic NSIP was evaluated. Methods: Surgical lung biopsy specimens of 63 patients [idiopathic fibrotic NSIP = 19, fibrotic NSIP associated with CVD = 9, idiopathic UIP = 26, and UIP associated with CVD = 9] were reviewed, and a score for lung fibroblast HSP47 expression was assigned. These patients' clinical features and survival were also analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in HSP47 expression between idiopathic fibrotic NSIP and fibrotic NSIP associated with CVD. The idiopathic fibrotic NSIP patients with higher HSP47 expression levels in their lung specimens had a poorer prognosis than patients with lower HSP47 expression levels. Conclusions: The present results suggest that lung fibroblast HSP47 expression may be a useful new prognostic marker for idiopathic fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据