4.5 Article

Gas6 evaluation in patients with acute dyspnea due to suspected pulmonary embolism

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 103, 期 4, 页码 589-594

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.018

关键词

Acute dyspnea; Gas6; Pulmonary infections; Pulmonary embolism

资金

  1. Regione Piemonte Ricerca sanitaria finalizzata [1051/2006]
  2. Universita del Piemonte Orientate A. Avogadro Ricerca locate 2005

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Gas6 protein is involved in pulmonary embolism (PE) and acute inflammation in animal models. Methods: We enrolled 82 consecutive patients with acute dyspnea and suspected RE (Geneva score with high (HCP) or low/intermediate clinical. probability (LICP) + D-dimer >= 0.5 mu g/mL) and 29 age-matched healthy volunteers. According to clinical and instrumental evaluations the following diagnoses were obtained: heart failure (HF), pulmonary or systemic infection (1), PE, or no illness (N). Twenty-two patients were excluded due to oral anticoagulation (9), lack of CT angiography or pulmonary scintigraphy (6), plasma creatinine >= 3 mg/dL (3), and pulmonary cancer (4). Plasma Gas6 was measured with a validated enzyme-linked immunoassay. Non-parametric tests and accuracy measures were calculated. Results: Out of 60 patients included, 8 were N, 12 HF, 11 1 and 29 PE. Gas6 median value in the N group (20.4 ng/mL, interquartile range 17.6-21.6) matched that of healthy volunteers, 19.1 (17.2-21.4). Median Gas6 values in HF, 26.4 (21.6-33.3) and I groups, 34.1 (30.0-38.7), were significantly higher than those in PE 18.2 (16.3-23.3) or N (Kruskal-Wallis test p <= 0.05) groups. Gas6 test improved PE diagnosis with an area under the curve of 0.80 and 0.91 (in all and LICP patients). A 24 ng/mL threshold excluded PE in 33% of LICP patients without loosing any diagnosis. Conclusions: The data link Gas6 protein to infection/inflammation, but not to PE, in humans. Gas6 assay was useful in PE diagnosis, improving D-dimer accuracy particularly in LICP patients, and limiting false positives. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据