4.5 Article

Office spirometry can improve the diagnosis of obstructive airway disease in primary care setting

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 103, 期 6, 页码 866-872

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.12.017

关键词

Asthma; COPD; Spirometry; GPs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Spirometry may reveal pre-clinical abnormal airway function in asymptomatic subjects and allow a better definition of severity in clinically diagnosed asthma and COPD. The hypothesis of this study was that telespirometry might increase the diagnostic accuracy of asthma and COPD. Methods: In the Italian Alliance study, 638 general. practitioners (GPs) were trained to perform telespirometry and were asked to enrol the following categories of subjects: (a) current or ex-smokers without respiratory symptoms; (b) subjects with respiratory symptoms but without a pre-existing diagnosis of asthma or COPD; (c) subjects with a pre-existing clinical diagnosis of asthma; and (d) subjects with a pre-existing clinical. diagnosis of COPD. Subjects completed a case report form (CRF) and performed telespirometry in the GP's office. Traces were sent by telephone to a Telespirometry Central Office, where they were interpreted by a pulmonary specialist, according to appropriately defined criteria. The results were returned in real time to the GP. Results: Overall, 9312 subjects were recruited and 7262 (78%) performed an acceptable telespirometric examination and the CRF. In the asymptomatic group, 340/1437 (24%) of the telespirometries were abnormal (147 with moderate-to-severe airway obstruction, i.e. FEV1 <80% of predicted). Among symptomatic subjects, 1433/3725 (38%) had abnormal telespirometries (682 with mode rate-to-severe obstruction). Of the asthmatic subjects, 336/1285 (26%) had moderate-to-severe airway obstruction, white telespirometry was normal in 184/815 (23%) of the COPD group. Conclusion: Telespirometry, performed in a GP's office, can aid the diagnosis of obstructive airway diseases and could help GPs to better manage airway obstruction. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据