4.5 Article

Oral bacteria - The missing link to ambiguous findings of exhaled nitrogen oxides in cystic fibrosis

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 187-193

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.09.009

关键词

Cystic fibrosis; Nitrite; Nitrate; Nitric oxide; Breath condensate; Saliva

资金

  1. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  2. Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association's Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Nitrite in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has been shown to be elevated in cystic fibrosis (CF), while exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is paradoxically low. This has been argued to reflect increased metabolism of NO while its diffusion is obstructed by mucus. However, we wanted to study the possible influence of salivary nitrite and bacterial. nitrate reduction on these parameters in CF patients by the intervention of an anti-bacterial. mouthwash. Methods: EBC and saliva were collected from 15 CF patients (10-43 years) and 15 controls (9-44 years) before and 5 min after a 30 s chlorhexidine mouthwash, in parallel with measurements of FENO. Nitrite and nitrate concentrations were measured fluorometrically. Results: EBC nitrite, but not nitrate, was significantly higher in the CF patients (median 3.6 vs 1.3 mu M in controls, p < 0.05) and decreased after mouthwash in both groups (3.6-1.4 mu M, p < 0.01; 1.3-0.5 mu M, p < 0.01). Salivary nitrite correlated significantly to EBC nitrite (r = 0.60, p < 0.001) and decreased correspondingly after chlorhexidine, whereas salivary nitrate increased. FENO was tower in CF and the difference between patients and controls was accentuated after mouthwash (5.4 vs 8.4 ppb in controls, p < 0.05). Conclusion: EBC nitrite mainly originates in the pharyngo-oral tract and its increase in CF is possibly explained by a regional change in bacterial. activity. The limited lower airway contribution supports the view of a genuinely impaired formation and metabolism of NO in CF, rather than poor diffusion of the molecule. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据