4.5 Article

Intervention by phone calls raises domiciliary activity and exercise capacity in patients with severe COPD

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 20-26

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.08.011

关键词

COPD; daily activity; accelerometer; actograph; pedometer; motivation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with severe COPD suffer from impairments of exercise capacity which affects daily activity. Conversely, activity might exert effects on the functional state. We studied whether a short-term intervention by regular phone calls caused an increase in activity at home and whether this resulted in a gain in exercise capacity. Methods: Over a 2-week period (P1) normal daily activity was assessed in 21 patients with stable severe COPD (GOLD III/IV). After this, the individual setting was explored in a short home visit. The subsequent 2-week period (P2) involved phone calls every other day to raise home-based activity (target: 3 x 15 min daily at 75% of maximum dyspnea). During the study, patients wore an actograph plus pedometer and kept a diary. Before P1 and after P2, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), Lung function, the Borg score and quality of life (SF-36, SGRQ) were determined. Results: Compared to P1, actograph counts (p<0.05) were higher in P2. There was also an increase in 6MWD (p<0.05) and quality of life scores (SF-36, p<0.05) between initial and final visit, whereby improvements in 6MWD correlated with changes in activity (p<0.01). Conversely, four patients who experienced an exacerbation in P2 showed no increase in activity or 6MWD. Conclusions: In patients with stable severe COPD, it was possible to increase activity by regular phone calls without performing previous rehabilitation. Increased activity resulted in increased exercise capacity and quality of life within 2 weeks, underlining the effectiveness of continued motivational support in patients with severe COPD. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据