4.5 Article

The Medical Research Council chronic dyspnea score predicts the survival of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 586-592

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.11.008

关键词

lung; fibrosis; Medical Research Council chronic dyspnea score; pulmonary function tests; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Medical Research Council (MRC) chronic dyspnea scale (6-point) is used in different clinical conditions to grade breathlessness on daily activities. We have previously shown that in patients with histologically documented usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (UIP/IPF), the MRC dyspnea scale is useful in estimating disease severity. The aim of this study was to further investigate the usefulness of the MRC scale in IPF as a marker of survival. Methods: The records of 25 patients with histologically documented UIP/IPF were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical parameters, pulmonary function tests, and arterial blood gases at the time of diagnosis, as well as survival time were retrieved and recorded for each patient. The impact of the different variables determined at diagnosis on survival was examined using the Kaptan-Meier and uni- and multi-variate Cox-regression analyses. Results: Among the baseline clinical and physiologic parameters determined at the time of IPF diagnosis, the MRC score, the Tiffeneau index, and the total lung capacity were the only significant and independent predictors of survival. In specific, a high MRC score, a high Tiffeneau index, and a low total lung capacity at presentation were associated with shorter survival. Conclusion: In accordance with the previous work, our results indicate that the Tiffeneau index and total lung capacity (TLC) are the important determinants of survival in patients with IPF In addition, we show that the simple MRC chronic dyspnea score estimated at the time of diagnosis is equally predictive of survival and may aid clinicians in assessing the prognosis of new cases of IPF (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据