4.4 Article

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Effects on Fibroblast Collagen Metabolism

期刊

RESPIRATION
卷 77, 期 2, 页码 195-202

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000163064

关键词

Collagen; Fibroblast; Granuloma; Matrix metalloproteinases; Mycobacterium tuberculosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Type I collagen synthesis and degradation are important events during Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTb) granuloma or cavity formation, and fibroblasts are cells involved in these processes. Objective: We examined the MTb effects on fibroblast collagen metabolism to understand the virulence factors involved in tuberculosis pathogenesis. Methods: Human lung fibroblasts were incubated with culture medium or sonicated MTb H37Ra (avirulent) or H37Rv (virulent) strains. The effects on collagen synthesis, fibroblast proliferation and collagenase activity were examined. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), MMP-13 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1) mRNA levels were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR amplification. Protein expression was explored by Western blot technique. Results: Collagen synthesis and fibroblast proliferation were significantly increased by H37Ra medium. In contrast, cells incubated with H37Rv medium showed an increase in collagenase activity. MMPs quantitative real-time PCR amplification revealed an increase on MMP-13 mRNA levels in fibroblasts cultured with H37Rv medium, with little effect observed on MMP-1 expression. Western blot assay demonstrated that H37Rv medium stimulated MMP-1 and MMP-13 proenzyme synthesis. This medium had a large effect on MMP-1 activation. TIMP-1 transcription was increased in cells incubated with medium and sonicated from H37Ra, although the highest TIMP-1 protein expression was found in fibroblasts cultured with sonicated H37Rv. Conclusions: These results suggest that MTb had direct effects on fibroblast collagen turnover, with differences in collagen synthesis and degradation depending on the strain. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据