4.7 Article

Regional water flows - Assessing opportunities for sustainable management

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 63-74

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.016

关键词

Urban metabolism; Urban water; Wastewater reuse; Rainwater harvesting

资金

  1. Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) [PTDC/SEN-ENR/111710/2009]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SEN-ENR/111710/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sustainable water management may strongly benefit from an integrated approach. Additionally, an integrated urban water management policy considering the various urban water flows and the possible interactions between the water sector and the remaining urban activities can benefit if based on an urban metabolism based analysis. This article assesses water flows of Lisbon Metropolitan Area considering the conventional water supply system and wastewater treatment system flows and also the hydrological cycle flows, and proposes a global set of indicators to perform a benchmarking analysis of the 18 municipalities of the region. Results highlighted the heterogeneous nature of the Metropolitan area in terms of water management - either in terms of management entities (predominantly public or municipalized), water consumption (varying from 227.4l/hab.day in Palmela to 402.7l/hab.day in Seixal), wastewater treatment (10 out of 18 municipalities already undergo secondary or tertiary wastewater treatments), runoff indices (depending on the municipality's level of urbanization), among other. Through the output volumes it was also assessed the potential of the municipalities to reuse wastewater for potable or non-potable urban uses, as well as the potential to harvest and harness rainwater. The main constraints to an integrated water management were identified and some potential solutions were measured and proposed even though they need further assessment, particularly in a cost-benefit perspective. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据