4.7 Article

Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 43-51

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011

关键词

Food waste prevention; Behaviour change; Greenhouse gas emissions; Consumption; Values

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is growing awareness of the positive impact of reducing the amount of wasted food on greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, food and water security, and land use. In developed nations, food waste generated in homes is a large contributor to the total amount of food waste. The behaviours and practices associated with this waste prevention (and waste generation) are complex for a number of reasons: food waste is the result of multiple, interacting activities and this leads to separation between the activity and their consequences. These behaviours are usually performed for reasons unrelated to waste prevention and have both a marked habitual element and a pronounced emotional component. Furthermore, the prevention of food waste has less 'visibility' to other people (e.g. neighbours) than many other pro-environmental behaviours (e.g. recycling), and therefore social norms around 'waste' play a reduced role compared to more 'visible' activities. This paper discusses insights into these behaviours from research funded by the Waste 82 Resources Action Programme (WRAP) and its partners in the UK. It discusses how these insights have been used in the development of a successful public-engagement campaign, which has been influential in the recent reduction in household food waste. These insights are also discussed in light of commonly used behavioural models, highlighting that many of these models are not designed for multiple, complex behaviours. However, considering the subject of food waste through the 'lenses' of different academic disciplines has helped the development of the public engagement on this issue. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据