4.7 Article

Empirical study of the environmental management of Italy's drinking water supply

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 119-130

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.001

关键词

Material flow analysis; Water drinking system; Bottled water; Tap water; Sustainability; Waste management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Italian drinking water supply structure includes two main systems: tap water and bottled water. Thanks to the first, drinking water is available almost all around domestic territory while bottled water represents one of the ways to make water available where and/or when there is no tap water. Due to the changing eating habits and lifestyles bottled water has become a large consumption beverage provoking a growth rate of the drinking water industry. The objective of this study is the analysis of the key environmental issues related to the Italian drinking water supply systems and of practical solutions for improving the sustainability of the both systems. The results obtained highlight that bottled water is less environmentally friendly than tap water because it requires much higher material (130-154 kg/m(3)) and energy (1000-4900 MJ/m(3)) inputs than tap water (respectively equal to 0.5-1.3 kg/m(3) and 2-3 MJ/m(3)) and generates more waste (130-155 kg/m(3) of bottled water versus 0.3-0.7 kg/m(3) of tap one). Among the different possible opportunities, to improve the sustainability of bottled water the authors present different options mainly related to the recycling of post-consumption bottles and the organization of logistics. With regard to tap water the main points of criticism are water losses and energy costs. Quantitative evaluations of the given alternatives make this analysis a concrete example of how it is possible (and necessary) for industrial sectors to implement environmental management to settle company development and environmental sustainability. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据