4.7 Article

SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 352-363

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.02.002

关键词

Robust optimization; Chance-constrained programming; Environment; Compromise programming; Solid waste management; Uncertainty

资金

  1. MOST [2005CB724200, 2006CB403307]
  2. Canadian Water Network under the Networks of Centers of Excellence (NCE)
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid stochastic robust chance-constraint programming (SRCCP) model was developed in this study for supporting municipal solid waste management under uncertainty. The method improves upon the existing robust-optimization (RO) and chance-constraint programming (CCP) approaches by allowing analysis on trade-offs among expected value of the objective function, variation in the value of the objective function and the risk of violating constraints that contain uncertain parameters. SRCCP could be used to examine the balance between solution robustness and model robustness. and was especially useful for analyzing the reliability of satisfying (or risk of violating) system constraints under complex uncertainties. A long-term municipal solid waste management problem was used to demonstrate the applicability of SRCCP, with violations for capacity constraints being assumed under various significance levels. The study results demonstrated that a higher system cost may guarantee that waste-management requirements and environmental criteria be met, and a lower cost may lead to a higher risk of violating the related regulations. The proposed SRCCP model could be used by waste managers for identifying desired waste-management policies under various environmental, economic, and system-reliability constraints and complex uncertainties. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据