4.7 Article

Stability evaluation of compost by respiration techniques in a rotary drum composter

期刊

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 829-834

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.12.003

关键词

stability; respiration rate; CO2 evolution; oxygen uptake rate; respiration quotient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stability of compost using respiration techniques is evaluated for four C/N ratio waste combinations (C/N 16, C/N 22, C/N 30 and C/N 38) of grass cutting, mix vegetable waste, cattle manure, food waste and sawdust in a rotary drum composter. CO2 evolution, oxygen uptake rate (OUR) was observed to asses the stability of compost. The CO2 evolution rates for C/N ratio 16, 22, 30 and 38 decreased from initial values of 7.88, 7.24, 7.01 and 7.89 mg/g VS/day to 0.76, 0.84, 1.24 and 2.37 mg/g VS/day, respectively, strongly reflecting the viability of rotary drum for various types of organic wastes waste with varying C/N ratios. On analyzing the results by ANOVA, the decrease in CO2 evolution varied significantly between the days (P < 0.0001) and treatments (C/N ratios) (P = 0.0013). On the other hand, ANOVA signify the variances between the soda lime and conductivity methods for CO2 evolution are almost equal with P value greater than 0.001. Hence, it proves that conductivity method is reliable and authentic for evolution Of CO2. Oxygen uptake rate (OUR) dropped up to 0.808 mg/g VS/day for C/N 22, and 3.438, 3.106 and 3.98 mg/g VS/day for C/N 16, 30 and 38, respectively, after the 20 days of composting in the rotary drum. It was found out that compost of initial C/N 22 is considered as very mature with a Solvita((R)) maturity index (based on OUR) of 8. Therefore, it can be suggested that that rotary drum composting of mixed organic waste at initial C/N ratio of 22 can produce more stable compost within 20 days of composting. While, C/N 16, 30 and 38 has a Solvita((R)) maturity index of 7, which can considered as finished compost, but it further require few more days for further maturation. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据