4.2 Article

Predicting Chinese Children and Youth's Energy Expenditure Using ActiGraph Accelerometers: A Calibration and Cross-Validation Study

期刊

RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 S56-S63

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2013.850989

关键词

cross-cultural; physical activity; regression; validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and cross-validate an equation based on ActiGraph accelerometer GT3X output to predict children and youth's energy expenditure (EE) of physical activity (PA). Method: Participants were 367 Chinese children and youth (179 boys and 188 girls, aged 9 to 17 years old) who wore 1 ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer on their right hip during the following tests/activities: resting metabolic rate (RMR), six 5-min treadmill walk/runs (tested at different speeds: 3km.h(-1), 4km.h(-1), 5km.h(-1), 6km.h(-1), 7km.h(-1), and 8km.h(-1)), 1 broadcast gymnastics, and 2 table-tennis exercises. Participants' oxygen consumption was measured using Cosmed K4b(2). The participants were randomly divided into a calibration group (n=331, 90%) and a cross-validation group (n=36, 10%). The calibration group's data were used to determine the relationship between EE and triaxial vector magnitude counts (VM) using the Pearson correlation and to derive the equation using a stepwise multiple regression. In the cross-validation group, differences between measured and predicted EE were evaluated using pairwise t tests. Results: VM activity counts had a moderately high correlation with EE (r=.758, p < .01). An EE prediction equation was developed: EE (kcal.min(-1))=0.00083 x VM + 0.073 x weight - 2.01 (R-2=.72, SEE=1.45 kcal.min(-1)). According to the cross-validation study results, this equation could predict the EE within the range of known accuracy (i.e., about 20% error). Conclusions: An equation based on ActiGraph accelerometer VM activity counts was derived to predict EE of PA in Chinese children and youth within the range of known accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据