4.6 Article

Effects of dexamethasone and meloxicam on bovine CD25+CD8+ and CD25-CD8+ T cells - in vitro study

期刊

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 662-674

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.12.005

关键词

Dexamethasone; Meloxicam; CD8(+) cells; Cytokines; Apoptosis; Bovine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of undertaken research was an in vitro evaluation of the effects of dexamethasone and meloxicam on selected bovine CD8(+)T lymphocyte subpopulations. Dexamethasone induced a fast-occurring and lasting depletion of CD25(-)CD8(+) cells. This was primarily the result of the proapoptotic effect of dexamethasone, but the antiproliferative effect of the drug was clearly responsible for the deepening of this disturbance. Dexamethasone transiently increased the relative and absolute CD25(high)CD8(+) and CD25(low)CD8(+) cell numbers. This effect was not a consequence of increased proliferation, but at least partly resulted from the antiapoptotic effect of the drug on these cells. The obtained results indicate that induction of CD8(+) lymphocyte depletion and impairment of IFN-gamma production by these cells participate in the production of the anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect of dexamethasone in cattle. An increase in Foxp3, IL-10 and TGF-beta production by CD8(+) lymphocytes is not involved in the production of these effects because the drug did not affect the percentage of TGF-beta(+)CD8(+) cells, while paradoxically reducing the percentage of cells with the suppressive phenotype, i.e. IL-10(+)CD25(low)CD8(+) and Foxp3(+)CD25(low)CD8(+) cells. Meloxicam did not substantially affect CD8(+) lymphocytes as to their percentage, absolute number, apoptosis, proliferation, Foxp3 expression and IFN-gamma, IL-10 and TGF-beta production. Thus, in the context of the parameters being estimated, meloxicam seems a relatively safe anti-inflammatory drug to be used in infectious diseases in cattle. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据