4.3 Article

Phosphorus limitation increases attachment in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and reveals a conditional functional redundancy in adhesin biosynthesis

期刊

RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 163, 期 9-10, 页码 674-684

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2012.10.013

关键词

Biofilm; Phosphate limitation; PhoR-PhoB; Adhesin

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM080546]
  2. Indiana University METACyt program
  3. Lilly Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial responses to phosphorus limitation, commonly inorganic phosphate (P-i), are important survival mechanisms in a variety of environments. The two-component sensor kinase PhoR and its cognate response regulator PhoB are central to the 131 limitation response of many bacteria and control the large Pho regulon. Limitation for P-i significantly increased attachment and biofilm formation by the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and this was driven by PhoB. Surprisingly, it was also found that both phoR and phoB were essential in A. tumefaciens. Expression of a plasmid-borne copy of the low affinity P-i transporter (pit) from Sinorhizobium meliloti in A. tumefaciens abolished the phoB and phoR essentiality in A. tumefaciens and allowed direct demonstration of the requirement for this regulatory system in the biofilm response. Increased attachment under P-i limitation required a unipolar polysaccharide (UPP) adhesin. Mutation of a polyisoprenylphosphate hexose-l-phosphate transferase (PHPT) called uppE abolished UPP production and prevented surface attachment under P-i-replete conditions, but this was rescued under P-i limitation, and this rescue required phoB. In low P-i conditions, either uppE or a paralogous gene Atu0102 is functionally redundant, but only uppE functions in UPP synthesis and attachment when P-i is replete. This conditional functional redundancy illustrates the influence of phosphorus availability on A. tumefaciens surface colonization. (C) 2012 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据