4.3 Article

Cell surface glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) of Lactobacillus plantarum LA 318 recognizes human A and B blood group antigens

期刊

RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 159, 期 9-10, 页码 685-691

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.07.005

关键词

Adhesion; Probiotics; ABO blood group antigen; Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Lectin

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [19002318, 00118358]
  2. Scientific Research [16380179]
  3. Ryoshoku Kenkyukai (Odawara, Japan)
  4. NIG Cooperative Research Program [2007-B44]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactobacillus plantarum LA 318 is a potential probiotic strain isolated from normal human intestinal tissue that shows high adhesion to human colonic mucin mediated by the bacterial cell surface glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). We report the adhesion mechanism of the lactobacilli is in part due to GAPDH binding to human ABO-type blood group antigens expressed on human colonic mucin (HCM). After periodate oxidation of HCM, adhesion of L. plantarum LA 318 bacterial cells significantly decreased compared to normal HCM. A BIACORE binding assay of GAPDH to blood group antigens was then performed. High binding was observed to A and B group antigens, while binding to H group antigen was lower (P < 0.01). No interaction was observed between GAPDH and various monosaccharides. Furthermore, GAPDH binding to the B-trisaccharide biotinyl polymer (BP)-probe [Gal alpha 1-3 (Fuc alpha 1-2) Gal-] was significantly higher as compared to B-disaccharide, Lewis D-trisaccharide, 3-fucosyl-N-acetylglucosamine and alpha-N-acetylneuraminic acid BP-probes. The data suggests the trisaccharide structure is important in binding to the blood group antigens. The binding of GAPDH to HCM significantly decreased after incubation with NAD(+). This suggests that the NAD binding domain on GAPDH may be related to binding to HCM. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据