4.5 Article

The Frequency of Metabolic Syndrome is Higher Among PCOS Brazilian Women With Menstrual Irregularity Plus Hyperandrogenism

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 1230-1236

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1933719111414205

关键词

polycystic ovary syndrome; metabolic syndrome; insulin resistance; PCOS phenotypes

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  2. Foundation for the Support of Research in the State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP-Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado) [2008/57640-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has a heterogeneous phenotypic distribution that can potentially lead to variations in metabolic repercussions. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 372 women of reproductive age (146 of whom were ovulatory and 226 with PCOS) divided into groups according to PCOS phenotype: (i) complete phenotype involving menstrual irregularity (MI), hyperandrogenism (H), and ultrasound (US) findings of polycystic ovaries (132 patients); (ii) MI + H (18 patients); (iii) MI + US (51 patients); and (iv) H + US (25 patients). The frequencies of metabolic syndrome (MetS) were 45.4%, 38.9%, 33.3%, 36%, and 8.2% for the MI + H + US, MI + H, MI + US, H + US, and control groups (P < .01), respectively. In logistic regression, body mass index ([BMI] odds ratio [OR]: 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.2) and the association of the complete phenotype with MI + H (OR: 5.8 CI95% [2.2-15.8) were independent predictors of the occurrence of MetS. The defining characteristics of MetS were more frequently found in women with PCOS than in controls, regardless of the phenotype (P < .01 for each variable). In conclusion, the frequency of MetS is similar for various PCOS phenotypes among young Brazilian women from the Southeast region of the country, although only BMI and the presence of MI + H, regardless of the presence of US findings, were more predictive of the development of MetS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据