4.6 Article

Trends in anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations across different stages of pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 367-374

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.05.011

关键词

Anti-Mullerian hormone; Ovarian arrest; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research question: What are the trends in anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) concentrations from pre-conception to the third trimester of pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? Design: Observational study including cross-sectional and longitudinal data analysis. The Beckman Coulter AMH Gen II Assay was used to determine AMH levels longitudinally before pregnancy from 52 women with PCOS and 51 controls during all trimesters. Differences in AMH levels across successive stages of pregnancy were examined with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired values. Linear regression models, adjusted for body-mass index (BMI), gestational and maternal age were used to compare AMH levels of PCOS and controls. Results: AMH levels decreased significantly (all P < 0.05) from pre-pregnancy level throughout each trimester in women with PCOS and healthy controls. After adjusting for maternal age, gestational age and maternal BMI, AMH levels before pregnancy were 1.89 (95% CI 1.46 to 2.44; P < 0.0001) times higher among women with PCOS compared with controls (median 766 versus 2.67 ng/ml). During the first trimester, AMH levels were 1.61 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.13; P = 0.001) times higher among women with PCOS compared with controls (median 5.33 versus 2.48 ng/ml). Differences in AMH levels between women with PCOS and controls in the second trimester (1.68 times higher; 95% CI 0.94 to 3.01; median: 5.50 versus 2.20 ng/ml) and the third trimester (1.45 times higher; 95% CI 1.01 to 2.07; median: 1.36 versus 1.06 ng/ml) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: These findings indicate a pregnancy-associated AMH-decline independent of pre-pregnancy elevated AMH levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据