4.6 Article

Derivation and characterization of human embryonic germ cells: serum-free culture and differentiation potential

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 238-249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60079-X

关键词

embryonic germ cells; human; pluripotent; primordial germ cells; serum free

资金

  1. Programme of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [30200137, 30671067]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [2002AA216161, G199954304-3]
  3. Shaanxi Province
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20080431253]
  5. Youth Research Key Member Programme of Northwest A F University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effects of a chemically defined culture medium supplement, knock-out serum replacement (KSR), on the growth and differentiation of human embryonic germ cells (hEGC) and found that the efficiency of the initial establishment of hEGC lines in KSR medium was significantly higher than in fetal calf serum (FCS) medium. The percentage of undifferentiated hEGC colonies growing in KSR medium was significantly higher than in FCS-based medium (P < 0.05). The hEGC colonies showed typical mouse embryonic germ cell-like morphology. They showed normal and stable diploid karyotype and expressed alkaline phosphatase (AP), stage-specific embryonic antigens (SSEA) and other specific markers of pluripotent cells. In addition, hEGC could form simple and cystic embryoid bodies (EB) that consisted of various cell types including neural, epithelial and rhythmically beating cardiac cells, even sperm-like and oocyte-like cells. Tumour-like outgrowths were formed in nude mice and found to contain a variety of cell types, including uterine epithelium, adipocytes, squamous tissue and skin structures. In conclusion, an appropriate serum-free culture system has been developed for the establishment of hEGC lines. This may provide an in-vitro model to study differentiation and can be used as a potential source of therapy for infertility and regenerative medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据